News, Views and Information about NRIs.

A NRI Sabha of Canada's trusted source of News & Views for NRIs around the World.



September 9, 2011

Solving heinous crimes? SIT is the cops’ answer!


Panchkula police has set up six teams so far, but none have been successful in cracking cases
Panchkula, September 9
The Panchkula police seems to taken a penchant for constituting special investigation teams (SITs) on unsolved cases. Six SITs have been formed in the recent past to uncover heinous cases of crime, but all have remained undetected.

In an important development, showcasing the inadequacy of SITs in the kidnapping case of Panchkula-based realtor Deepak Rai Sagar, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has handed over the probe to the CBI.
The Panchkula police had constituted an SIT in the credit card cloning cases, in which a number of Panchkula residents had lost more than Rs 40 lakh to fraudsters.
An SIT was also formed in the case of murder of a Berkeley Automobiles security guard and the subsequent robbery of Rs 14.5 lakh.
Others were set up in the cases of kidnapping of two-year-old Jiya and one-and-a-half-year-old Arnav. In both cases, the abductors released them after taking huge sums from the parents, but the police failed to nab the kidnappers.
In the double murder case of Panchkula-based financier Vinod Mittal and his son Yashan, in which the accused had thrown the bodies in the Rajpura canal, the police had formed an
SIT. Four of the accused were arrested, but the main accused, Raju and Shilpa, were still at large. Sources said top officials formed SITs to crack cases, but during investigation, police officials who were part of the SITs would be transferred, hampering the probe.
The sources added that in most cases, circumstantial evidence had been lost and it was not possible to reconstruct the crime scene and collect vital samples from the spot.
Panchkula Superintendent of Police Maneesh Chaudhary said it would be wrong to suggest that SITs had failed to crack cases. He added that in the double murder case, the police had arrested a majority of the accused and only the main accused were at large.
Regarding the status of the other cases, he stated that they were still investigating the cases and had not closed the probe in any of those.

Cases concerned
  • Berkeley murder-and-loot case: Formed in January, 2011, but to no avail
  • Credit card cloning case: Constituted under DSP (Crime) Ram Chandar Rathi on November 24, 2010
  • Arnav kidnapping case: Formed in October, 2010, but did not succeed
  • Deepak Rai Sagar kidnapping case: Set up in November, 2009, but case transferred to CBI
  • Jiya kidnapping case: Constituted on October 25, 2009, but no breakthrough
  • Vinod and Yashan Mittal murder case: Set up in March, 2009; police held four accused, main accused at large
What is SIT?
A special investigation team involves experts who focus on a specific case. No time limit is given to them to catch the culprits. The cases they deal with can be those involving murder, robbery, kidnapping or crimes that involve a large number of suspects. The SIT head reports directly to the Superintendent of Police in the district.

Woman ‘IAS officer’, aide held for Rs 45-lakh fraud

Chandigarh, September 9
The Palampur police today arrested a woman from Sector 37 here for impersonating as an IAS officer. Pooja Sharma and her partner Mohit Sharma were arrested and booked under Sections 468, 471 and 120 of the IPC.
They were in the dock for preparing forged documents for the sale of a piece of land at Palampur in Himachal Pradesh. The police said Pooja had posed as an IAS officer and cheated Dr Rajiv Bedi of Mohali and SK Bedi of Chandigarh.
She had reportedly taken away Rs 45 lakh from them after giving them forged land documents. Dr Rajiv Bedi and SK Bedi had approached the police and filed a complaint against Pooja and her three accomplices.
Pooja’s track record revealed that she had also cheated a number of persons in Una district, claimed the police. She also owned a Ford Ikon car, with a red beacon atop, making others believe that she was an IAS officer.
UT cops not in the loop
The SHO of the Sector-39 police station, inspector Charanjeet Singh, said they were unaware of any arrests by the Himachal Pradesh Police.

Kaypee, Jaura meet PM on Anand Marriage Act


New Delhi, September 9
Jalandhar MP Mohinder Singh Kaypee and president of the International Punjabi Civil Society RS Jaura today met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to seek immediate resolution to the Anand Marriage Act imbroglio.
Jaura said the PM was told that there was a need for the Act felt among the Sikhs globally. Jaura, along with former Union Minister MS Gill, had met Law minister Salmaan Khursheed two days back on the issue.

Sehajdhari Voting Row


SGPC goes to HC against Harbhagwan
Chandigarh, September 9
In yet another twist to the ongoing controversy in the Sehajdhari Sikhs voting rights case, the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) today moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking the prosecution of senior advocate Harbhagwan Singh.
Senior advocate-cum-Punjab’s former Advocate-General Harbhagwan Singh had told the High Court Bench that he was appearing on behalf of the Centre and that the impugned notification debarring Sehajdhari Sikhs from voting in the SGPC elections stood withdrawn. But, the Centre, the very next day, had clarified that the notification was still in force.
The application, under Section 151 of the CPC read with Section 340 of the CrPC, seeks the initiation of the proceedings against Harbhagwan Singh and alleged co-conspirators for false evidence and criminal conspiracy under Section 193 and 120-B of the IPC.
The SGPC has claimed that Harbhagwan Singh had never represented the Union of India in any of the civil writ petitions in the matter prior to September 1, when the Bench on his statement disposed of the case.
The SGPC claimed that even on September 1, no authority letter or document was placed before the full Bench to show he was authorised and instructed or briefed to appear on behalf of the Union of India and to make any such statement.
The SGPC claimed it was apparent that Harbhagwan Singh deliberately made a false and wrong statement. In the process, he not only misled the High Court, but also outraged the religious sentiments of the whole Sikh community across the world, particularly the SGPC, the Sant Samaj, all religious institutions of the Sikhs and the Jathedars of all the five Akal Takhts.
The SGPC added the deliberate and false statement was made with an oblique motive and was a result of a very deep-rooted conspiracy of higher-ups of political parties, whose sole aim was to stall the SGPC elections scheduled to be held on September 18 by adopting illegal means, as 10 candidates have already been elected unopposed.
A reference has also been made to the interview of Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed carried in The Tribune.
The news item, dated September 6, has not only been annexed with the application, but has also been culled out and reproduced in the application. Quoting The Tribune, the application says, “Putting the blame of the SGPC poll controversy on senior counsel Harbhagwan Singh, Law Minister Salman Khursheed today said it was the counsel who failed to represent the government properly in the case and he had therefore been withdrawn.
“How could he convey to the high court a decision that had not even been taken by the government? Who would have taken the decision to rescind the 2003 notification barring Sehajdhari Sikhs from participating in the SGPC poll? Either the Cabinet would have taken that decision or the Home Ministry through the Prime Minister. When none of this was done, how could the counsel say what he said to the court?” Khursheed told The Tribune today.

Interest rates to remain high: SBI


Bank plans to open 60 branches in region; launches new car loan product 

 
Chandigarh, September 9State Bank of India (SBI), the country’s largest lender, has said that lending rates would continue to be high in the wake of spiraling inflation.
“Interest rates are likely to remain high because inflation is high ... till such time, inflation is high, Reserve Bank finds it difficult to lower the interest,” SBI Chairman Pratip Chaudhuri said.
Describing pre-payment penalty as an anti-customer step, the SBI Chairman said that the bank had already waived such penalty on floating loans two months back.
The Bank plans to add over 800 branches within the country. It will also open a foreign subsidiary in Australia, besides a new branch in Doha.
“We have a network of over 12,000 branches, and we are looking at adding over 800 new branches. We will be adding 60 new branches in the Chandigarh circle,” he added.
He added the Bank was also looking to increase the number of circles, from the present 14 to 17.
“Banks should be doing well because the country is growing at 8 per cent. We think our deposits and loan growth should grow by 20 per cent in this fiscal,” he said.
"We are coming out with a product for car loan in which EMI will be Rs 1,700 per lakh. If someone taken a loan of Rs 3 lakh then he will pay close to Rs 5,000 as instalment," he said, adding, "interest will also be calculated on daily balance."
Asked about its Rs 20,000 crore right issue to fund its expansion plans, Chaudhuri said, "it is very much there and it should happen next month or so."
This will allow the bank to raise capital from the market and fund its expansion plans.
On the merger of SBI with associate banks, Chaudhary said that the Bank was likely to go in for the merger of two Banks, including State Bank of Patiala, by next year.
"Each merger requires a lot of cash flow, and we will be able to go ahead with the mergers only next year,” he said. — With Agency Inputs

Canadian can't travel to U.S. after 9/11


Calgary man barred from U.S. among many ensnared in post-9-11 border tangle



the middle-aged Calgary businessman says he doesn't know why.
He's one of many Canadians who now think twice before they head to the U.S. — or can't go there at all — because of post-9-11 security restrictions.
"The whole thing has just been a nightmare, really," he said in an interview.
Hamoud spoke to The Canadian Press on condition his full name not be published out of fear it would only make his travel problems worse.
After going to the United States many times over the decades, he and his daughters had to cancel a spring 2010 vacation in New York and Florida because the U.S. Homeland Security Department did not clear him for entry.
Five days after returning home from the airport, Hamoud was visited by two Canadian Security Intelligence Service officers who asked lots of questions. But even they couldn't figure out why the U.S. had barred him.
He says he's not involved in criminal or extremist activity, and still has no answers from the Americans.
Hamoud has missed six business events in the U.S. — no-shows that are taking their toll on his company. He has also had difficulty flying within Canada, as Air Canada consults the U.S. no-fly list even for domestic flights.
Hamoud's lawyers have taken up his case with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration. But he says there is no guarantee he will be allowed into the U.S.
"It really demeans an individual."
Ihsaan Gardee, executive director of the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations, said his group still receives reports from Muslims about difficulty crossing the border.
"When I speak to members of the community, some of them do express a concern about travelling," he said.
"They may choose to travel to different destinations as a result of this."
The 49th parallel, once known as the world's longest undefended border, is now littered with security-related stumbling blocks.
Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart says the long-standing free pass the Americans once granted their polite northern neighbours has been withdrawn as a result of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
"I think that Canada's in a difficult place," she said in an interview.
"What you're seeing over the decade is the move by the United States to impose the values of border surveillance that it uses (for) the rest of the world increasingly on Canadians."
The scrutiny is likely to intensify as Canada pursues a perimeter security pact with the United States. The idea is to beef up continental screening, with the notion that once people and goods have won passage into North America, there will be less need to examine them at the Canada-U.S. border.
Opponents say Canada faces an erosion of sovereignty and weaker control over personal information about Canadians by forging such a deal.
Some point to the case of Maher Arar, the Ottawa communications engineer who was shipped to Syria and tortured into false terrorism confessions in an abysmal Damascus prison after the RCMP passed inflammatory information about him to the Americans.
"It's not just the sharing of the information with the U.S. that we're concerned about," Gardee said. "Who is the U.S. sharing this information with?"
Stoddart recently told the government that Canadians won't accept weaker protection of their personal details simply to win a perimeter security deal.
She says Canadian officials "are extremely mindful" of what's at stake, having consulted her office three times to date on the perimeter issues.
But she believes a more laissez-faire approach to privacy south of the border may see the two countries differ on key points, including where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, what exactly constitutes personal information, and the legal implications of transferring such data to third parties.
"I would be concerned that we move more towards an American-style model of collecting personal information," Stoddart said.
"The Americans have fewer checks on sharing information — so that tidbits of our lives from everywhere would be increasingly pulled together in accordance with an American model rather than a Canadian model, which tends to segregate the information for privacy purposes and share only on a 'needs-to-know' basis."
One goal of a security deal is an entry-exit database that would track individuals as they arrive in or leave either Canada or the U.S. — information that would be shared between the countries.
Such a system could include cross-border flow of biometric data — personal identifiers like fingerprints or iris scans.
Stoddart warns such innovations are not a panacea.
"We know there is no technological system that is failsafe and foolproof. So we are watching this very, very carefully."
A recent summary of consultations on the perimeter security proposal carried out by the government says some Canadians were hesitant about sharing more traveller information with the U.S.
"These concerns centred on the loss of sovereignty, the protection of personal information shared between the two countries, and a general sentiment that not enough was known about the proposed measures."
A poll conducted for the privacy commissioner by Harris-Decima found that about four in five Canadians would be at least somewhat concerned if Canada started sharing more information than it currently does with the United States.
But since 9-11 the practice has been quietly mushrooming behind the scenes. Consider that:
— Millions of Canadians have acquired passports and other secure identification documents in recent years to ensure they can still travel to the United States — spelling an end to the simple verbal declaration of citizenship;
— The U.S. Secure Flight program will allow collection of name, gender and birth date from the approximately five million Canadians who fly through American airspace every year en route to destinations such as the Caribbean and Mexico — even though their planes don't touch American soil;
— The government admits Canadian air passengers labelled a "high risk" to security have no way of directly challenging confidential profiles the United States compiles about them — even when the files contain data from Canada.
A June 2006 audit by Stoddart's office raised concerns about lax controls at the Canada Border Services Agency. "The CBSA cannot, with a reasonable degree of certainty, report either on the extent to which it shares personal information with the United States, or how much and how often it does so."
Lorne Lawson, director general of the border agency's risk assessment programs directorate, has met with counterparts in Washington at U.S. Customs and Border Protection to discuss enhanced information sharing.
The border agency refused to make Lawson, or any other official, available to discuss the initiatives. Nor would Foreign Affairs, the lead agency on the perimeter security talks, grant an interview about the negotiations.
As a result, it's unclear whether — or how — such plans might help unclog the thickening border.
All the while, the United States has been adding, not peeling back, the layers.
Over the last two years, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has made what it calls "critical security improvements along the northern border," adding inspectors at the ports of entry and Border Patrol agents between ports, as well as refurbishing land crossings.
Nearly 3,800 Customs and Border Protection officers scrutinize people and goods at crossings, the department says.
The number of Border Patrol agents along the northern parallel has increased 700 per cent since 9-11.
And some three dozen land ports of entry are being modernized.
Stoddart, whose family has long had a farm in the Eastern Townships of Quebec, remembers something quite different 20 years ago when driving into Vermont with her two young children.
"They got ice cream cones and I got a newspaper," she recalls. "You would actually cross a field in which cows grazed."
At the gate was a sign: Entering U.S. territory, please check in at the nearest border post.
"That's a good memory, but that's a long time ago and it's not going to come back in the foreseeable future."

20 Ways to prevent cancer


First, the good news: You probably won’t get cancer.
That is, if you have a healthy lifestyle. “As many as 70% of known causes of cancers are avoidable and related to lifestyle,” says Thomas A. Sellers, PhD, associate director for cancer prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa. Still, since cancer is one of the top five lady killers, taking steps to eat a healthy diet, increase exercise, and avoid tobacco products is key; however, recent research has uncovered many small, surprising ways you can weave even more disease prevention into your everyday  life. Try these novel strategies and your risk of cancer could dwindle even more. 
1. Filter your tap water
You’ll reduce your exposure to known or suspected carcinogens and hormone-disrupting chemicals. A new report from the President’s Cancer Panel on how to reduce exposure to carcinogens suggests that home-filtered tap water is a safer bet than bottled water, whose quality often is not higher—and in some cases is worse—than that of municipal sources, according to a study by the Environmental Working Group. (Consumer Reports’ top picks for faucet-mounted filters: Culligan, Pur Vertical, and the Brita OPFF-100.) Store water in stainless steel or glass to avoid chemical contaminants such as BPA that can leach from plastic bottles.
2. Stop topping your gas tank
So say the EPA and the President’s Cancer Panel: Pumping one last squirt of gas into your car after the nozzle clicks off can spill fuel and foil the pump’s vapor recovery system, designed to keep toxic chemicals such as cancer-causing benzene out of the air, where they can come in contact with your skin  or get into your lungs.
3. Marinate meat before grilling
Processed, charred, and well-done meats can contain cancer-causing heterocyclic amines, which form when meat is seared at high temperatures, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which get into food when it’s charcoal broiled. “The recommendation to cut down on grilled meat has really solid scientific evidence behind it,” says Cheryl Lyn Walker, PhD, a professor of carcinogenesis at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. If you do grill, add rosemary and thyme to your favorite marinade and soak meat for at least an hour before cooking. The antioxidant-rich spices can cut HCAs by as much as 87%, according to research at Kansas State University.
4. Caffeinate every day
Java lovers who drank 5 or more cups of caffeinated coffee a day had a 40% decreased risk of brain cancer, compared with people who drank the least, in a 2010 British study. A 5-cup-a-day coffee habit reduces risks of oral and throat cancer almost as much. Researchers credit the caffeine: Decaf had no comparable effect. But coffee was a more potent protector against these cancers than tea, which the British researchers said also offered protection against brain cancer.

5. Water down your cancer risk
Drinking plenty of water and other liquids may reduce the risk of bladder cancer by diluting the concentration of cancer-causing agents in urine and helping to flush them through the bladder faster. Drink at least 8 cups of liquid a day, suggests the American Cancer Society.
6. Load up on really green greens
Next time you’re choosing salad fixings, reach for the darkest varieties. The chlorophyll that gives them their color is loaded with magnesium, which some large studies have found lowers the risk of colon cancer in women. “Magnesium affects signaling in cells, and without the right amount, cells may do things like divide and replicate when they shouldn’t,” says Walker. Just 1/2 cup of cooked spinach provides 75 mg of magnesium, 20% of the daily value.
7. Snack on Brazil nuts
They’re a stellar source of selenium, an antioxidant that lowers the risk of bladder cancer in women, according to research from Dartmouth Medical School. Other studies have found that people with high blood levels of selenium have lower rates of dying of lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Researchers think selenium not only protects cells from free radical damage but also may enhance immune function and suppress formation of blood vessels that nourish tumors.
8. Burn off your breast cancer risk
Moderate exercise such as brisk walking 2 hours a week cuts risk of breast cancer 18%. Regular workouts may lower your risks by helping you burn fat, which otherwise produces its own estrogen, a known contributor to breast cancer.
9. Skip the dry cleaner
A solvent known as perc (short for perchloroethylene) that’s used in traditional dry cleaning may cause liver and kidney cancers and leukemia, according to an EPA finding backed in early 2010 by the National Academies of Science. The main dangers are to workers who handle chemicals or treated clothes using older machines, although experts have not concluded that consumers are also at increased cancer risk. Less toxic alternatives: Hand-wash clothes with mild soap and air-dry them, spot cleaning if necessary with white vinegar.
10. Ask your doc about breast density
Women whose mammograms have revealed breast density readings of 75% or more have a breast cancer risk 4 to 5 times higher than that of women with low density scores, according to recent research. One theory is that denser breasts result from higher levels of estrogen—making exercise particularly important (see #8). “Shrinking your body fat also changes growth factors, signaling proteins such as adipokines and hormones like insulin in ways that tend to turn off cancer-promoting processes in cells,” Walker says.
11. Head off cell phone risks
Use your cell phone only for short calls or texts, or use a hands-free device that keeps the phone—and the radio frequency energy it emits—away from your head. The point is more to preempt any risk than to protect against a proven danger: Evidence that cell phones increase brain cancer risk is “neither consistent nor conclusive,” says the President’s Cancer Panel report. But a number of review studies suggest there’s a link.
12. Block skin cancer with color
Choosing your outdoor outfit wisely may help protect against skin cancer, say Spanish scientists. In their research, blue and red fabrics offered significantly better protection against the sun’s UV rays than white and yellow ones did. Don’t forget to put on a hat: Though melanoma can appear anywhere on the body, it’s more common in areas the sun hits, and researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have found that people with melanomas on the scalp or neck die at almost twice the rate of people with the cancer on other areas of the body.
13. Pick a doc with a past
Experience—lots of it—is critical when it comes to accurately reading mammograms. A study from the University of California, San Francisco, found that doctors with at least 25 years' experience were more accurate at interpreting images and less likely to give false positives. Ask about your radiologist's track record. If she is freshly minted or doesn't check a high volume of mammograms, get a second read from someone with more mileage.
14. Eat clean foods
The President’s Cancer Panel recommends buying meat free of antibiotics and added hormones, which are suspected of causing endocrine problems, including cancer. The report also advises that you purchase produce grown without pesticides and wash conventionally grown food thoroughly to remove residues. (The  foods with the most pesticides: celery, peaches, strawberries, apples, and blueberries. See the full list of dirtiest fruits and vegetables here.) “At least 40 known carcinogens are found in pesticides and we should absolutely try to reduce exposure,” Sellers says.

15. Read food labels for folic acid
The B vitamin, essential for women who may become or are pregnant to prevent birth defects, is a double-edged sword when it comes to cancer risk. Consuming too much of the synthetic form (not folate, found in leafy green veggies, orange juice, and other foods) has been linked to increased colon cancer risk, as well as higher lung cancer and prostate cancer risks. Rethink your multivitamin, especially if you eat a lot of cereal and fortified foods. A recent CDC study discovered that half of supplement users who took supplements with more than 400 mcg of folic acid exceeded 1,000 mcg per day of folic acid. Most supplements pack 400 mcg. Individual supplements (of vitamin D and calcium, for instance) may be a smarter choice for most women who aren’t thinking of having kids.
16. Up your calcium intake
Milk's main claim to fame may also help protect you from colon cancer. Those who took calcium faithfully for 4 years had a 36% reduction in the development of new precancerous colon polyps 5 years after the study had ended, revealed Dartmouth Medical School researchers. (They tracked 822 people who took either 1,200 mg of calcium every day or a placebo.) Though the study was not on milk itself, you can get the same amount of calcium in three 8-ounce glasses of fat-free milk, along with an 8-ounce serving of  yogurt or a 2- to 3-ounce serving of low-fat cheese daily.

17. Commit to whole grains
You know whole wheat is better for you than white bread. Here’s more proof why you should switch once and for all: If you eat a lot of things with a high glycemic load—a measurement of how quickly food raises your blood sugar—you may run a higher risk of colorectal cancer than women who eat low-glycemic-load foods, found a Harvard Medical School study involving 38,000 women. The problem eats are mostly white: white bread, pasta, potatoes, and sugary pastries. The low-glycemic-load stuff comes with fiber.
18. Pay attention to pain
If you’re experiencing a bloated belly, pelvic pain, and an urgent need to urinate, see your doctor. These symptoms may signal ovarian cancer, particularly if they're severe and frequent. Women and physicians often ignore these symptoms, and that's the very reason that this disease can be deadly. When caught early, before cancer has spread outside the ovary, the relative 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer is a jaw-dropping 90 to 95%.
19. Avoid unnecessary scans
CT scans are a great diagnostic tool, but they deliver much more radiation than x-rays and may be overused, says Barton Kamen, MD, PhD, chief medical officer for the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. In fact, researchers suggest that one-third of CT scans could be unnecessary. High doses of radiation can trigger leukemia, so make sure scans are not repeated if you see multiple doctors, and ask if another test, such as an ultrasound or MRI, could substitute.
20. Drop 10 pounds
Being overweight or obese accounts for 20% of all cancer deaths among women and 14% among men, notes the American Cancer Society. (You're overweight if your body mass index is between 25 and 29.9; you're obese if it's 30 or more. Click here to gauge your BMI.) Plus, losing excess pounds reduces the body's production of female hormones, which may protect against breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer. Even if you're not technically overweight, gaining just 10 pounds after the age of  30 increases your risk of developing breast, pancreatic, and cervical, among other cancers.
Tell us:  What healthy food do you eat every day?
More from Prevention: